<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave &#8211; what does this mean 12months from now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shannonboudjema.com/future-trends/google-wave-what-does-this-mean-12months-from-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shannonboudjema.com/future-trends/google-wave-what-does-this-mean-12months-from-now/</link>
	<description>Social technology and how it defines people, marketing and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: miro</title>
		<link>http://www.shannonboudjema.com/future-trends/google-wave-what-does-this-mean-12months-from-now/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>miro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shannonboudjema.com/?p=1084#comment-64</guid>
		<description>the bigger question is (although I love Wave) will it allow people to integrate their regular email with Wave mail in one session, I also wonder if they will eventually adopt a twitter like feed stream - neither questions covered in their 80 minute developers presentation

I&#039;m not a beta user, but have seen some comments that these are separate entities

as far as spam, my understanding is that a wave is a self contained unit..meaning its an invite only micro-event, therefore spamming is cut off at the source</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bigger question is (although I love Wave) will it allow people to integrate their regular email with Wave mail in one session, I also wonder if they will eventually adopt a twitter like feed stream &#8211; neither questions covered in their 80 minute developers presentation</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a beta user, but have seen some comments that these are separate entities</p>
<p>as far as spam, my understanding is that a wave is a self contained unit..meaning its an invite only micro-event, therefore spamming is cut off at the source</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.shannonboudjema.com/future-trends/google-wave-what-does-this-mean-12months-from-now/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shannonboudjema.com/?p=1084#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Ahah! Those are excellent points you raise Kimmo. You&#039;re absolutley right. I am definitely in the minority when it comes to putting up with the google madness only to make use of Google&#039;s Chrome. And the spamming... I&#039;ve been moaning for several weeks about the spam in twitter. Enough to send me searching for the next twitter. I am going to play with Wave of course... but you&#039;re right.. I&#039;m likely only to use it in a professional setting... but I can&#039;t imaging putting up with more madness beyond Chrome just to have the right. I wonder who will trump Google&#039;s Wave? Cuz you know... whoever it is... they are already all over it. HAH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahah! Those are excellent points you raise Kimmo. You&#8217;re absolutley right. I am definitely in the minority when it comes to putting up with the google madness only to make use of Google&#8217;s Chrome. And the spamming&#8230; I&#8217;ve been moaning for several weeks about the spam in twitter. Enough to send me searching for the next twitter. I am going to play with Wave of course&#8230; but you&#8217;re right.. I&#8217;m likely only to use it in a professional setting&#8230; but I can&#8217;t imaging putting up with more madness beyond Chrome just to have the right. I wonder who will trump Google&#8217;s Wave? Cuz you know&#8230; whoever it is&#8230; they are already all over it. HAH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo Linkama</title>
		<link>http://www.shannonboudjema.com/future-trends/google-wave-what-does-this-mean-12months-from-now/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo Linkama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shannonboudjema.com/?p=1084#comment-62</guid>
		<description>No doubt there&#039;s also going to be Crazy Fast spamming. Let&#039;s hope Google can find a way to keep spammers at bay. At least Gmail&#039;s spam filters seem to be extremely efficient.

The problem with Google services is that they&#039;re not very business-friendly. I can&#039;t imagine my clients getting themselves a Google identity just to collaborate with me. As long as Google shuts out non-accountholders their services are going to be pretty unusable from a business point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt there&#8217;s also going to be Crazy Fast spamming. Let&#8217;s hope Google can find a way to keep spammers at bay. At least Gmail&#8217;s spam filters seem to be extremely efficient.</p>
<p>The problem with Google services is that they&#8217;re not very business-friendly. I can&#8217;t imagine my clients getting themselves a Google identity just to collaborate with me. As long as Google shuts out non-accountholders their services are going to be pretty unusable from a business point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
